Windows Vista Forums


Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Interesting Microsoft's wireless mouse project: line of sight or what?

 
 
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      28th January 2010, 06:45 PM
I've never used wireless mice or keyboards before and need to learn how
reliable they are when used in "proximity" to a small form factor PC that
will be mounted "behind" a HDTV mounted to a wall. I'm planning to put the
keyboard and mouse in a box mounted to the wall just below the HDTV hung on
the wall inches above. When the lid of the box is opened it will swing down
like a tray holding the keyboard and mouse but I don't know if this will be
allow the keyboard and mouse to operate?

How would Microsoft's wireless keyboard and mice work then? I'll continue to
do some looking around but any help to determine how these things actually
work so I can know the range and limits will be very helpful to me thank
you...

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      28th January 2010, 10:45 PM
Post in reply to: Hillbilly

These devices use radio frequency communications, not infrared; so they
don't need to have direct line of sight. They are highly range-limited
though so your plan may or may not work.


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      29th January 2010, 12:45 AM
Post in reply to: Richard G. Harper

Microsoft's wireless keyboard runs on batteries? How long might they last
would you know?


 
Reply With Quote
 
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      29th January 2010, 06:45 AM
Post in reply to: Hillbilly
Hi, Hillbilly.

There are several different wireless desktops (keyboard and mouse), and they
use more than one wireless technology.

I'm far from an expert on these things, but I've used several wireless sets,
from both Logitech and Microsoft. The first ones I used were not truly
"wireless". They had a cable about 6' long running to a fist-sized
transceiver that sitting on a bookshelf a few feet to the side of my
monitor, well above my computer case on the floor. These needed to be near
line-of-sight, but were not terribly picky about that. Another set used a
Bluetooth dongle; this did not require line-of-sight; I didn't use this set
very long, partly because of problems with getting and keeping the sender
and receivers "paired".

My current set is version 3.0 of the Microsoft Wireless Desktop Laser 6000,
which uses 2.4 GHz wireless. As Richard said, this does not require
line-of-sight, and distance has not been a problem in my small office.

Battery life also has not been a major concern, although they do have to be
replaced now and then. I've not tried to record the frequency, but it has
not been bothersome in my case.

There are a couple of non-obvious problems that bothered me but night not
concern you. First, I gave away that Bluetooth set because I could not
dual-boot with it. Bluetooth would not work until Windows was started and
loaded the BT drivers. This meant that I could not choose among WinXP and
various Vista beta builds because the keyboard wasn't working at the point
when the choice needed to be made, so I was locked into the default OS each
time. Other desktop sets had similar problems depending on WHICH USB port
the dongle was plugged into. If I plugged it into the port on the
motherboard, it worked, but if I plugged it into a 4-port hub which was
plugged into an add-on USB PCI card, it had problems similar to the
Bluetooth dilemma. Now that I've got the hub plugged onto the mobo port,
that problem has been eliminated.

The other problem was keyboard narcolepsy, or "sleeping sickness". When the
2.4 GHz transceiver is plugged into a USB port on the back of the computer
case, there seemed to be some kind of interference because the keyboard
would simply stop responding, often right in the middle of a word! No
keystroke would register for almost 2 minutes. Then it would wake up and
continue normally for some random length of time before going to sleep
again. I could solve this problem by moving the transceiver to the hub, a
foot or two closer to the keyboard on my desk - but then I had the "can't
dual-boot" problem again - until I changed the USB port for the hub itself.

Everything is fine now, but maybe my long narrative will give you some hints
of points to check out before you choose which desktop set to get - and
where to position the components. I DO like this Laser 6000 set, version
3.0. (The mouse still says v. 2.0.)

RC
--
R. C. White, CPA
San Marcos, TX

Microsoft Windows MVP
Windows Live Mail 2009 (14.0.8089.0726) in Win7 Ultimate x64

news:Ome$...

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wireless Optical Mouse 2000: mouse remains on after shutdown Hardware Troubleshooting 0 4th November 2009 06:45 AM
This is interesting System Peformance & Maintenance 7 12th April 2008 09:49 AM
Interesting why are lots of people getting can't send email - me t Windows Mail 6 23rd March 2008 05:08 PM
Interesting article on "Drive-by pharming" General Security 1 23rd March 2008 03:57 PM
Interesting problem similar to others- unique twist Internet, Networking & Sharing 2 23rd March 2008 03:25 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:30 PM.
Vista Forums is an independent website and is not affiliated with Microsoft Corporation.