64 bit programs
Windows Vista Forum
Home      Members   Calendar   Who's On
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
      


12»»

64 bit programsExpand / Collapse
Author
Message
Paul
Posted 11/20/2009 2:45:04 PM




This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_004B_01CA69E1.F7CE4910
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Is there any utility or program that can tell whether your system is =
using 64bit programs?
I ask because I just installed Nitro PDR Pro 6 x64 and it installed it =
in the x85 Programs Directory. There's no way I can even tell if a true =
64 bit program is actually being utilized in my 64 bit OS. I know I'm =
being anal but with all the talk of 64 bit vs 32 bit, I started getting =
curious. Seems that all the big box stores sell computers mostly with =
64 bit Windows installed but a great majority of the programs are 32 bit =
(I know they don't make many).

------=_NextPart_000_004B_01CA69E1.F7CE4910
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



http-equiv=3DContent-Type>

15px"=20
id=3DMailContainerBody leftMargin=3D0 topMargin=3D0 bgColor=3Dffffff=20
CanvasTabStop=3D"true" name=3D"Compose message area">
Is there any utility or program that =
can tell=20
whether your system is using 64bit programs?

I ask because I just installed Nitro =
PDR Pro 6 x64=20
and it installed it in the x85 Programs Directory.  There's no way =
I can=20
even tell if a true 64 bit program is actually being utilized in my 64 =
bit=20
OS.  I know I=92m being anal but with all the talk of 64 bit vs 32 =
bit, I=20
started getting curious.  Seems that all the big box stores sell =
computers=20
mostly with 64 bit Windows installed but a great majority of the =
programs are 32=20
bit (I know they don't make many).

 


------=_NextPart_000_004B_01CA69E1.F7CE4910--

Post #249157
Ken Blake, MVP
Posted 11/20/2009 4:45:03 PM




Post in reply to: Paul




What you say is largely correct. There are very few 64-bit programs
yet. That means that the advantage of 64-bit Windows is mostly
*potential* right now. I think it's good to be running 64-bit Windows
instead of 32-bit Windows, because it lets you buy and install 64-bit
software as it becomes available in the future (and almost certainly,
we will all start seeing more and more of this very soon). But don't
expect much of a performance increase until you start running 64-bit
software.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup
Post #249180
Carl Kaufmann
Posted 11/20/2009 4:45:04 PM




Post in reply to: Paul

Open Task Manager and look at the Processes tab. 32-bit processes
are suffexed with "*32". Everything else is 64-bit.
Post #249184
d3aths3rver
Posted 11/20/2009 6:45:06 PM





start/ run type in winver

if not in there right click "computer" and go to properties should tell
you there.


--
d3aths3rver
Post #249198
Gene E. Bloch
Posted 11/20/2009 8:45:37 PM




Post in reply to: d3aths3rver


Did you mean to post in a different thread?

--
Gene E. Bloch letters0x40blochg0x2Ecom
Post #249212
Gene E. Bloch
Posted 11/20/2009 8:45:37 PM




Post in reply to: Carl Kaufmann


Hah! What a deal! I never noticed this...

Thanks.

--
Gene E. Bloch letters0x40blochg0x2Ecom
Post #249213
Stan Starinski
Posted 11/22/2009 12:45:04 AM





What you say is largely correct. There are very few 64-bit programs
yet. That means that the advantage of 64-bit Windows is mostly
*potential* right now. I think it's good to be running 64-bit Windows
instead of 32-bit Windows, because it lets you buy and install 64-bit
software as it becomes available in the future (and almost certainly,
we will all start seeing more and more of this very soon). But don't
expect much of a performance increase until you start running 64-bit
software.

Post #249383
Death
Posted 11/22/2009 12:45:05 AM




Stan Starinski wrote this, and it somehow bypassed my kill-file:


Why did you not quote Ken Blake on that?
He said that in the same thread, you friggen moron.

--
Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,
Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

Post #249387
Ken Blake, MVP
Posted 11/22/2009 10:45:05 AM




On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:07:27 -0500, Death
wrote:



He not only said the same thing I did, he repeated it word for word.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup
Post #249424
Death
Posted 11/22/2009 10:45:06 AM




Post in reply to: Ken Blake, MVP


You can bet if spelling errors are less than 30% in his posting, it's
plagiarized.

--
Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,
Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.


Post #249428
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

12»»

Reading This TopicExpand / Collapse
Active Users: 0 (0 guests, 0 members, 0 anonymous members)
No members currently viewing this topic.

PermissionsExpand / Collapse

All times are GMT -6:00, Time now is 10:21am

Powered By InstantForum.NET v4.1.4 © 2010
Execution: 0.141. 8 queries. Compression Enabled.