About Linux versions
Windows Vista Forum
Home      Members   Calendar   Who's On
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
      



About Linux versionsExpand / Collapse
Author
Message
STAN STARINSKI
Posted 11/1/2009 4:45:02 PM




As said I am strictly Windows.'
But if I play with Linux, it's NovellSUSE
Not Debian-based Ubuntu, which is funded, di doyu know? By Mark
Shuttleworth, remember S.A. entrepreneur whos epaid for a SpaceShuttle trip
and changed hi slastname?

He makes money on Extended TechSupport for Ubuntu, no tmuch money but Ubuntu
is not entirely free, problem it creates pitiful amount of jobs & is as
inferior to Windows, as free healthcare would be to commercial. Nothing
good is free in this world, except natural commodities like air, and even
that is a limited & increasingly polluted resources

Nothing sux more than something you don't pay for, when you grow up &
realize you spent years on playing with Hobbyist Operating System.
Again if I play with it, it's SUSE.

SUSE is simply closer to commercial quality, yes you will say Novell is in
bed with Microsoft.
So WHAT??? In fact it's a good sign.

Post #245087
Justin
Posted 11/1/2009 6:45:05 PM




Post in reply to: STAN STARINSKI


Thanks for that little editorial, Stan.
Get a Mac.
Post #245101
STAN STARINSKI
Posted 11/1/2009 6:45:07 PM




No you get HP.

Apple's strength is in movie/high-end graphics & an original, Art-friendly
OS, but even that is largely equalized with Windows & Intel, moreover Intel
chipsets have been adopte dby Apple awhile ago.
The main difference now is it's still more Arty, but I frankly don't want a
computer which looks like a mental patient designed it.

Likewise there's no reason to pay for Versace label on a woman's handbag,
but for irratiaonal creatures appearance matters.

I dont care for Macs.
Matter of fact I hated them, in the recent years not as intensely but still
not liking them.

Post #245105
Justin
Posted 11/1/2009 8:45:09 PM




Post in reply to: STAN STARINSKI

Had one - hated it. They refused to honor the warranty for a hard drive
because of "unspecified abuse."


Irrational - yeah. That's always what the people on the bottom of the
totem pole say.
"My Lacetti is just as good at that C Class!"
Post #245134
Kevin SmallBone
Posted 11/1/2009 10:45:03 PM




Post in reply to: Justin


Putting any version of Linux on a hard drive constitutes abuse.



Post #245144
Justin
Posted 11/2/2009 12:45:03 AM




Post in reply to: Kevin SmallBone

I didn't put Linux on it.
Post #245152
Charlie
Posted 11/3/2009 8:45:03 PM




Post in reply to: Justin


You probably couldn't find it...
Post #245632
Charlie
Posted 11/3/2009 8:45:03 PM




Post in reply to: Justin

He needs to get a life, a MAC is beyond his capabilities...
Post #245633
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »


Reading This TopicExpand / Collapse
Active Users: 0 (0 guests, 0 members, 0 anonymous members)
No members currently viewing this topic.

PermissionsExpand / Collapse

All times are GMT -6:00, Time now is 12:33am

Powered By InstantForum.NET v4.1.4 © 2010
Execution: 0.109. 9 queries. Compression Enabled.