|
| | |
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 12/20/2007 1:21:42 AM
Posts: 3, Visits: 10 |
| I finally rebuilt my computer with raid0 using 2 Sata 3Gb/s Harddrives. After setting up my HDD and instaling Windows Vista, I ran benchmark on my HDD performance. The performance is not close to what I was expecting. The read/write performance seem to be the same as non-raid. I also tried copying 1 file (1gig file) from one location to another, and it takes about 35 seconds. This is also about the same as my other computer with non-raid. I also do not notice significant improvement in starting up windows or applications.
Whats' the performance I should expect from raid0? and how long does it take to copy a 1 gig file? I just don't see much improvement between raid0 and non-raid.
|
| |
| | | | 
Lead Forum Moderator
Group: Vista Forum Moderator
Last Login: Today @ 9:29:47 PM
Posts: 1,858, Visits: 1,636 |
| Since you installed Vista yourself, you probably know how to image off the OS partition and restore it. Now that Vista SP 1 RC is out, you could download and install it. It's supposed to have performance improvements. At least that way, you'll now if the performance is ever going to get better under Raid0.
ASUS A832nSLI-Deluxe, AMD 64X2 4400 OC 2.4GHz, 3GB OCZ,
Running: XP Pro, Vista Ultimate 32-bit, Vista Business, Ubuntu 7.10, Ubuntu 8.04 LTS
 |
| |
| |
|