|
| | | 
Vista Beginner
 
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 5/14/2008 2:31:25 PM
Posts: 52, Visits: 177 |
| well i have made it to the core.......very good and difficult game so far.
thermaltake soprano case
thermaltake 750 psu
XFX GeForce 8800GTS
ASUS Arctic square
ASUS P5K3 deluxe
core2 quad q6600
sndblster x-fi extreme
2GB corsair DDR3 1066vista home premium....score=5.6 |
| |
| | | | Vista Goddess
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 12/14/2007 12:06:19 PM
Posts: 607, Visits: 842 |
| I thought that too, however I also think it is very much a 'far cry' clone with nothing particularly original and I think COD4 has got it beaten hands down for not only visuals but gameplay and storyline, the Crysis ending NO SPOILERS is so just...........like is that it? but COD4 is just brilliant something totally unexpected, if it comes to a GOTY I cannot see Crysis being any higher than 2nd place.
|
| |
| | | | 
Xtr3m3 G4m3r
Group: Vista Forum Moderator
Last Login: 2/4/2008 7:18:45 AM
Posts: 223, Visits: 220 |
| I liked the graphical gizmos of Crysis but when it actualy got to the gameplay it was okay at best. Sure i like all the suit functions but i prefer having people around me....... No just enemies, some allies would be nice.
Vista PC XP PCAsus M2N-X ASRock P4G HD 2600XT 256 X1650 Pro 512 AMD 4200+ X2 Pentium 4 2.53 GHz 2 GB DDR2 Corsair 675 MHz 1.5GB DDR Kingston 400MHz 250 GB Western Digital Caviar 80GB Damaged Seagate HDD 6GB Western Digital Boot Drive |
| |
| | | | 
Vista Newbie
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 3/20/2008 2:34:23 PM
Posts: 15, Visits: 17 |
| cyclic (12/8/2007)
I thought that too, however I also think it is very much a 'far cry' clone with nothing particularly original and I think COD4 has got it beaten hands down for not only visuals but gameplay and storyline, the Crysis ending NO SPOILERS is so just...........like is that it? but COD4 is just brilliant something totally unexpected, if it comes to a GOTY I cannot see Crysis being any higher than 2nd place.
I absolutely hated Call of Duty 4, I saw nothing new in it whatsoever except the shooting through objects which was more annoying than strategic, and I felt like I was trudging through the same old tired gameplay the entire time, every level it's fight waves of enemies and move on, the gameplay didn't even feel very intense by comparison to Crysis, it "looked" intense but it didn't feel like it. I could essentially just sit in a corner the whole time and peek out and shoot repeatedly through most of the levels, which almost put me to sleep. Then I tried multiplayer which actually turned out to be really good. Where as Crysis I loved it the entire time, it may have been a far cry clone, but it offered a lot more new content for Far Cry, than Call of Duty 4 did for Call of Duty. Also I'd like to point out that Call of Duty 4 DOES NOT look better than Crysis at all. Call of Duty 4 looks good, but you can tell quite obviously it's just Call of Duty 2 with a new coat of paint. Crysis has huge environments and every little detail looks incredible. Call of Duty 4, everything is smooth and fake looking, Crysis has an extraordinary amount of detail, right down to the pores on their faces, the stitches in their uniforms.
Though I do admit the ending was awful, it just kind of abruptly cuts to the credits out of nowhere...
Vista Ultimate 64
Geforce 8800GTS
AMD 64 X2 5200+
4GB DDR800 RAM
500GB Harddrive
Sound Blaster X-Fi Platinum Fatal1ty Champion |
| |
| | | | 
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 3/12/2008 10:46:24 AM
Posts: 2, Visits: 5 |
| KelsieKatt (12/29/2007)
cyclic (12/8/2007)
I thought that too, however I also think it is very much a 'far cry' clone with nothing particularly original and I think COD4 has got it beaten hands down for not only visuals but gameplay and storyline, the Crysis ending NO SPOILERS is so just...........like is that it? but COD4 is just brilliant something totally unexpected, if it comes to a GOTY I cannot see Crysis being any higher than 2nd place.
I absolutely hated Call of Duty 4,I saw nothing new in it whatsoever except the shooting through objects which was more annoying than strategic, and I felt like I was trudging through the same old tired gameplaythe entire time, every level it's fight waves of enemies and move on, the gameplay didn't even feel very intense by comparison to Crysis, it "looked" intense but it didn't feel like it. I could essentially just sit in a corner the whole time and peek out and shoot repeatedly through most of the levels, which almost put me to sleep.Then I tried multiplayer which actually turned out to be really good. Where as Crysis I loved it the entire time, it may have been a far cry clone, but it offered a lot more new content for Far Cry, than Call of Duty 4 did for Call of Duty. Also I'd like to point out that Call of Duty 4 DOES NOT look better than Crysis at all. Call of Duty 4 looks good, but you can tell quite obviously it's just Call of Duty 2 with a new coat of paint. Crysis has huge environments and every littledetail looks incredible. Call of Duty 4, everything is smooth and fake looking, Crysis has an extraordinary amount of detail, right down to the pores on their faces, the stitches in their uniforms.
Though I do admit the ending was awful, it just kind of abruptly cuts to the credits out of nowhere...
im sorry but a game is what u make it...
1]. if u sit in cod and peek out all day nipping at ur enemy i wont be any fun.
2]. yes, the attention to detail in crysis was amazing...as was that dam suit.
both games are fun, but both have their flaws, no sense in going to war over our individual preferences.
[the end of crysis gave me a migrane, and i was already suffering from the glitches]
T O S H I B A
QOSMIO F45-AV425
important stuff
vista ultimate
core 2 duo @2.0 fsb 800
2g of 667ram
300g hard drive
nVIDIA 8600m gt
extras
Harmon Kardon speakers with subwoofer
Dolby 5.1
hd dvd rom
HDMI-out |
| |
| | | |
Vista Newbie
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 3/20/2008 2:34:23 PM
Posts: 15, Visits: 17 |
| overkoreone (3/12/2008)
im sorry but a game is what u make it...
1]. if u sit in cod and peek out all day nipping at ur enemy i wont be any fun.
1. I don't actually play like that...
But realistically you can't "make anything of it" the game is entirely linear and forces every player to play exactly the same way... The whole game is essentially a target practice simulator. Almost every level follows the same pattern, enter area, tons of targets spawn(enemies), shoot them all as fast as you can and run to the next point, rinse and repeat. Although I will admit Act II was somewhat fun, and I did enjoy the Sniper level quite a bit. Otherwise the rest was extremely shallow. Aside from the gameplay I enjoyed the story, theatrics, and the production values, but the gameplay was a step back from even previous Call of Duty games. The term "All Flash, no Substance" comes to mind.
I'm starting to notice a trend here, these days most gamers don't really want a game, with deep choices and interactivity, they want a flashy roller coaster ride that plays out like an interactive movie.
Vista Ultimate 64
Geforce 8800GTS
AMD 64 X2 5200+
4GB DDR800 RAM
500GB Harddrive
Sound Blaster X-Fi Platinum Fatal1ty Champion |
| |
| | | | 
Forum Moderator
Group: Vista Forum Moderator
Last Login: 6/23/2008 8:26:49 PM
Posts: 39, Visits: 79 |
| Crysis is a good game. I loved Far Cry, and Crysis just follows that tradition. But, it is more of a tech demo (similar to Doom3, among many others). It seems the engine and graphics were the highest priority and the actual game was second. It's not a bad game, but it could have been more.
The CoD series has atmosphere. It is just awesome. I haven't played CoD4 yet, but the rest of the series is amazing.
--
Dustin Harper
|
| |
| |
|