﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Windows Vista Forum / Vista Technical / Drivers  / Help on Sata with Raid 0 / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v4.1.4</generator><description>Windows Vista Forum</description><link>http://www.vistaforums.com/Forum/</link><webMaster>Admin@VistaForums.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:58:45 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>RE: Help on Sata with Raid 0</title><link>http://www.vistaforums.com/Forum/Topic12469-21-1.aspx</link><description>Since you installed Vista yourself, you probably know how to image off the OS partition and restore it.  Now that Vista SP 1 RC is out, you could download and install it.  It's supposed to have performance improvements.  At least that way, you'll now if the performance is ever going to get better under Raid0.</description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:20:47 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>WAW8</dc:creator></item><item><title>Help on Sata with Raid 0</title><link>http://www.vistaforums.com/Forum/Topic12469-21-1.aspx</link><description>I finally rebuilt my computer with raid0 using 2 Sata 3Gb/s Harddrives.  After setting up my HDD and instaling Windows Vista, I ran benchmark on my HDD performance.  The performance is not close to what I was expecting.  The read/write performance seem to be the same as non-raid.  I also tried copying 1 file (1gig file) from one location to another, and it takes about 35 seconds.  This is also about the same as my other computer with non-raid.  I also do not notice significant improvement in starting up windows or applications.&lt;BR&gt;Whats' the performance I should expect from raid0? and how long does it take to copy a 1 gig file?  I just don't see much improvement between raid0 and non-raid.&lt;BR&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:24:01 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>kenshiro24</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>